Government moves discouraging soft-drink use would hit companies [image-nocss] already suffering from sliding sales and prices. Soft-drink sales volume fell 3% in 2008, dropping for the fourth straight year, according to the report, citing Beverage Digest.
"You're not going to solve the complexities of health-care reform with a tax on soda pop and juice drinks," said Kevin Keane, a spokesperson for the American Beverage Association. "We're not against health-care reform. We just believe this potential funding mechanism isn't the way to go."
The price tag is among the biggest challenges in President Barack Obama's push to revamp the U.S. health-care system. Lawmakers are looking at dozens of proposals, searching for savings and new revenue.
The beverage association, a Washington lobbying group for Atlanta-based Coca-Cola and other non-alcoholic beverage makers, is leading efforts to quash a soda tax. The group called on members and their employees to put pressure on Congress, saying the industry is "under attack."
The Corn Refiners Association, a Washington trade group that represents Decatur, Ill.-based Archer Daniels, is also in the fight.
"The point is to scare legislators and the White House about putting something on the table by getting a taste of the attacks they will encounter," Julian Zelizer, a professor of history and public affairs at Princeton University in New Jersey, told Bloomberg.
Coca-Cola's press office directed questions to the beverage lobby group. Archer Daniels spokesperson Roman Blahoski declined to comment.
On the other side, the Center for Science in the Public Interest and the American Public Health Association, both based in Washington, are pushing to keep the tax as an option as long as Congress is struggling to pay the health-care tab.
"It's a great way to raise revenue and a relatively painless way to do so," said Georges Benjamin, executive director of The American Public Health Association.
A soda tax is on the Senate Finance Committee's list of potential revenue sources. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that a 3-cent tax on 12-oz. cans of sodas would raise $50 billion over a decade.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.), has played down the proposal's chances, saying a soda tax is "on life support." Farmers in Baucus' home state grow sugar beets, while many of those in Iowa, home of the committee's ranking Republican, Charles Grassley, grow corn, which is used to make sweeteners for soft drinks.
With a pressing need to raise money to pay for the overhaul, other lawmakers are not so quick to pull the plug. In the House, Bill Pascrell (D-N.J.), a member of the tax-writing Ways & Means Committee, said costs of a health-care bill are so high that lawmakers will surely consider a soda tax. "If we're going to be preventing chronic diseases, absolutely you put that on the table," he said.
Advocates argue that taxing sweetened drinks would both raise cash for health-care coverage and reduce the need for doctors' visits. Sweetened drinks are "worse than practically every other food on the market," said Michael Jacobson, executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest. "They're empty calories, we consume such huge volumes of them and liquid calories are particularly conducive to obesity."
The beverage lobby and its supporters say it is misguided to target a single product. "It's erroneously suggesting that Americans can improve their health by eating one food or not eating another food," Audrae Erickson, president of the corn refiners group, told the news agency. A soft-drink tax also would fall most heavily on poor people, she said. "When you tax a food, you're disproportionately affecting those at lower ends of the income scale."
Members help make our journalism possible. Become a CSP member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.