Since 2003, retailers selling tobacco products in San Francisco have had to apply for a special permit. The permitting process helps the city keep track of sellers and crack down on those vending to minors, officials said.
But now there are too many permits citywideparticularly in low-income neighborhoodsaccording to city officials and anti-tobacco advocates, who have created legislation [image-nocss] that would greatly reduce the number of stores that sell tobacco, reports the San Francisco Examiner.
An initial proposal imposes a cap of 35 permits for each of the 11 supervisor districts385 total in the city. That is a more than two-thirds reduction from the 1,097 stores currently selling tobacco products citywide, acccording to the newspaper.
The proposal would not take away permits from businesses, but it would reduce them through attrition until there are no more than 35 per district. Also, owners would not be able to transfer the permits when they sell their stores, said Janet Clyde, a commissioner in the Office of Small Business.
The proposal might limit options for smokers, but it would also limit tobacco exposure to children, said Matt Rosen, senior director of community programs for the Youth Leadership Institute.
The institute wrote the legislation and is receiving guidance the Department of Public Health.
The legislation is still being vetted and has not been endorsed by a supervisor.
"[Children] can see advertising," Rosen told the newspaper. "They can see stores that are visibly selling tobacco and other kinds of products that aren't very good for them."
The Department of Health says limiting permits would be an extension of its "commitment to public health." Last year, tobacco-related death and disease cost the city $4,310 per smoker, anti-tobacco activists say.
Opponents of the proposal, mainly from the small-business community, say the bill would severely damage the health of retailers in San Francisco.
For most stores, "approximately 30% of the revenue is tobacco-related," said Jimmy Shamieh, president of the Arab American Grocers Association, which has proposed alternative legislation that bans new permits but allows a transfer to new owners.
The stores become "valueless" when owners cannot transfer their tobacco permit to a person who wants to purchase the store, Shamieh said.
"It will change the landscape of San Francisco as we know it," Shamieh said. "It will make it corporate-friendly. It will be devastating to mom-and-pop businesses."
The new initiative is the latest is a string of efforts by the sity to limit smoking.
Last year, San Francisco became the first city in the nation to ban tobacco sales in pharmacies. The law exempts supermarkets and big-box stores, such as Costco, that contain pharmacies.
Also, the city recently imposed a 20-cent fee on each pack of cigarettes sold to offset the cost to clean up cigarette butts from city streets.
Supervisor Eric Mar is also reigniting stalled legislation that would forbid smoking in a slew of new settings, adding to an existing ban in bars, restaurants, parks, transit stops and taxicabs. The bill would expand no-smoking zones to include farmers markets and the outdoor seating areas of restaurants, cafes and coffee shops. Smoking would also be prohibited while waiting in lines at ATMs, theaters, athletic events and concert venues.
Members help make our journalism possible. Become a CSP member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.