"The jury reached the correct result and determined that the plaintiff failed to meet the criteria established by this particular court to prevail at trial," said Murray Garnick, Altria Client Services senior vice president and associate general counsel, speaking on behalf of Richmond, Va.-based Philip [image-nocss] Morris USA.
Garnick said that this case was the third case tried to verdict since the Florida Supreme Court's decision which allowed former Engle class members to proceed by relying on findings by the former Engle jury. Approximately 4,000 claims, or approximately half of those filed in the wake of the Florida Supreme Court's decision in the Engle case, are pending in federal court and have been put on hold pending a federal appeals court review of the constitutional issues that arise from allowing the plaintiff to rely on prior Engle jury findings.
"The jury's verdict in this case shows that Philip Morris USA still has powerful defenses in these cases even when the trial court misinterprets the Florida Supreme Court's holding in Engle and allows the plaintiff to improperly rely on a prior jury's findings that have no connection with the plaintiff," added Garnick. "Philip Morris USA will vigorously defend each individual Engle progeny case that goes to trial. We continue to believe each plaintiff must prove the essential elements of their claims and that we continue to have very strong defenses to these type of cases."
The case is Gelep v. RJ Reynolds and Philip Morris USA.
Members help make our journalism possible. Become a CSP member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.