The groups include the American Petroleum Institute (API) and the National Association of Truck Stop Operators (NATSO).
In a letter to EPA assistant administrator Gina McCarthy, the organizations express concerns regarding the lack of independent testing on "mid-level" ethanol blends. The letter [image-nocss] said increasing levels of ethanol in gasoline could pose a danger to consumer safety and could harm engines and the environment.
Current law limits the amount of ethanol in conventional gasoline to 10%.
Many of the groups that signed the letter are working together on a campaign seeking to prevent EPA from approving 15% ethanol (E15) in gasoline. More information on this campaign, called "Say NO to Untested E15," is available at www.followthescience.org.
EPA is expected to announce a decision on the use of E15 in late-model cars in the next few weeks. Ethanol producers backing E15 have also sought approval for the use of E12 for a wider range of vehicles.
The letter reads:
Re: Joint Opposition to Approval of "E12" Without Comprehensive New Engine, Emissions and Safety Testing
Dear Assistant Administrator McCarthy:
The undersigned organizations strongly oppose recent requests by ethanol manufacturers that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approve a new and untested mid-level ethanol blend ("E12," or gasoline blended with 12% ethanol) for all gasoline engines.
There has been no opportunity to review the data submitted in support of an E12 authorization, no public comment period or peer review of the data purported to support this request, and no specific testing conducted by independent experts that supports the data submitted. We collectively agree that EPA must move cautiously to prevent the introduction of new mid-level ethanol blends that may impact engine durability, increase emissions, be incompatible with existing on- and non-road vehicles and engines, and decrease consumer safety.
Our organizations continue to oppose the introduction of E15 into commerce without comprehensive and independent testing. EPA approval of E12, without the same rigorous and extensive independent testing and without the opportunity for public comment and critique of the data submitted to support E12 would be misguided and would sidestep the new fuels and additives protections enacted by Congress and embodied in Section 211(f)(4) of the Clean Air Act.
Signers included: American Meat Institute American Petroleum Institute Association of International Automobile Manufacturers Engine Manufacturers Association Grocery Manufacturers Association International Liquid Terminals Association International Snowmobile Manufacturers Association Motorcycle Industry Council National Chicken Council National Consumers League National Council of Chain Restaurants National Marine Manufacturers Association National Meat Association National Petrochemical & Refiners Association National Turkey Federation NATSO National Association of Truck Stop Operators Natural Resources Defense Council Outdoor Power Equipment Institute Recreational Off-Highway Vehicle Association Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council Snack Food Association Specialty Equipment Market Association Specialty Vehicle Institute of America
Members help make our journalism possible. Become a CSP member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.