Beverages

Simple Pleasures'

American Beverage Association, others launch campaign to fight soda tax
WASHINGTON -- Industry groups are fighting a soft-drink tax proposal that is not part of any pending health care measure. Still, they're taking no chances, said USA Today. The American Beverage Association recently began a $2 million ad campaign to oppose a tax on sugar-sweetened drinks, depicting it as a tax on "simple pleasures."

Last month, the group joined forces with the National Restaurant Association and the Grocery Manufacturers Association to launch Americans Against Food Taxes, a coalition of 110 state and local groups.

As President Obama and members [image-nocss] of Congress hold town-hall-style meetings on health care, the sugar-tax debate is brewing in the capital, said the report.

"There's a good argument that can be made" for taxing the causes of chronic, costly illnesses, Representative Bill Pascrell (D-N.J.) who has a diabetic son, told the newspaper.
Proponents, citing how higher tobacco taxes reduced smoking, are pushing a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages, including fruit and energy drinks, to fight obesity and fund a health care overhaul.

"This is one option," Thomas Frieden, director of the Centers for Disease Control& Prevention (CDC), told the paper, adding that his view does not represent the Obama administration. He pointed out that obesity is a growing problem, and taxpayers foot half the cost through Medicare and Medicaid. He said soft drinks are the single largest contributor.

"If it costs more, people will drink it less," Frieden said. He said a penny-an-ounce tax could reduce consumption by more than 10% and raise $100 billion over 10 years.

House and Senate committees looked at the tax earlier this year but, as opposition mounted, dropped it from their menu.

Most states tax soft drinks, often as part of broader taxes on food or vending machine sales, the report said.
"People view it as an overreach of government when the tax code is used to tell them what to eat and drink," Kevin Keane of the beverage association told the paper. Hesaid the tax hurts low- and middle-income people most.

"It makes no sense to single out one product," Keane added, noting a recent dip in soft-drink sales. In the 1990s, sales rose an average of 3% a year but began falling in 2006, said USA Today, citing John Sicher, editor of Beverage Digest, an industry publication.

A report last month by the Urban Institute, a nonprofit research group, does not single out soft drinks. It proposes to tax all fattening foods, including chocolate, based on a British model that calculates a food's nutritional value against its calories, the report said. It suggests using part of the $500 billion raised over a decade to reduce the cost of fruits and vegetables and increase food stamp allotments.

"If you want to eat food that makes you obese, that's your right," but you should help pay the societal costs, said co-author Stan Dorn. He said a tax could help low-income people by paying for health care and healthier foods.

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a CSP member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Snacks & Candy

How Convenience Stores Can Improve Meat Snack, Jerky Sales

Innovation, creative retailers help spark growth in the snack segment

Technology/Services

C-Stores Headed in the Right Direction With Rewards Programs

Convenience operators are working to catch up to the success of loyalty programs in other industries

General Merchandise/HBC

How Convenience Stores Can Prepare for Summer Travel Season

Vacationers more likely to spend more for premium, unique products, Lil’ Drug Store director says

Trending

More from our partners