Fuels

Feinstein, Toomey Introduce Bill to Repeal Ethanol Mandate

Say requirement "drives up the cost of everything from gasoline to groceries"

WASHINGTON -- U.S. Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) are working to repeal a law that they say drives up the cost of everything from gasoline to groceries.

Dianne Feinstein ethanol (CSP Daily News / Convenience Stores / Gas Stations)

The Feinstein-Toomey Corn Ethanol Mandate Elimination Act of 2015, which they introduced on February 26, abolishes the corn ethanol mandate in the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) is also a cosponsor of the measure.

The RFS requires annual increases in the amount of renewable fuel that must be blended into the total volume of gasoline refined and consumed in the United States; however, the current statute effectively mandates the use of corn ethanol at the expense of other fuels, they said. The requirement drives up the price of corn, products made from corn, livestock that feeds on corn and many products on grocers' shelves and in refrigerators.

"The RFS requires fuel suppliers to blend millions of gallons of biofuels--most often corn ethanol--into the nation's gasoline supplies. It drives up gas prices, increases food costs, damages car engines, and is harmful to the environment," said Toomey.

"Under government mandates, refiners--such as ours in Trainer, Pa.--are forced to make a choice: increase the ethanol content in their fuel blends or pay a penalty by purchasing credits from energy traders," he said. "Once again, this is the government using corporate welfare to shower money on a favored industry and then send the bill to the general public. Labor leaders, businesses and environmental groups have lined up to push back against this harmful regulatory regime. I am pleased to join with Sens. Feinstein and Flake to stop the RFS before more harm is done."

"The federal mandate for corn ethanol is both unwise and unworkable. Our bill addresses that with a simple, smart modification to the Renewable Fuel Standard program," said Feinstein. "A significant amount of U.S. corn is currently used for fuel. If the mandate continues to expand toward full implementation, the price of corn will increase. According to the Congressional Budget Office, that would mean as much as $3.5 billion each year in increased food costs. Americans living on the margins simply can't afford that.

She continued, "Our infrastructure has a ceiling for the amount of corn ethanol that can be used, and we're rapidly approaching it. Companies are physically unable to blend more corn ethanol into gasoline without causing problems for many gas stations and older automobiles. The mandate also pits corn ethanol against other renewable fuels, which has stunted the growth of environmentally friendly advanced biofuels like biodiesel and cellulosic ethanol. Once the mandate for corn ethanol is gone, the RFS program will be able to focus on those fuels that best reduce greenhouse gas emissions and don't compete with our food supply."

Said Flake, "In 2005, Congress bought into the corn ethanol mandate for billions of dollars, and taxpayers have been stuck with a lemon ever since. Congress can no longer justify a policy that props up the ethanol industry at the expense of taxpayers, consumers, the hungry, and the environment. I am pleased to join my colleagues on both sides of the aisle in supporting the full and immediate repeal of the corn ethanol mandate."

The Renewable Fuel Standard, first enacted in 2005, required refiners and blenders to use 18.15 billion gallons of renewable fuel in 2014. More than 14 billion gallons of this total will be met by the use of corn ethanol, a level that will increase in subsequent years.

There are two key problems with continuing to mandate the consumption of more and more corn ethanol each year, according to the senators:

  • Corn consumption: Approximately 40% of the U.S. corn crop is now used to produce ethanol, artificially inflating food and feed prices while damaging the environment.
  • Blend wall: As gasoline consumption declines, refiners face a "blend wall" when the RFS mandate exceeds the limit at which ethanol can be blended into the fuel supply, determined to be 10% of total gasoline consumption.

Click here to view letter from groups supporting this legislation, including the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, American Petroleum Institute, National Restaurant Association and Snack Food Association.

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a CSP member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Foodservice

Opportunities Abound With Limited-Time Offers

For success, complement existing menu offerings, consider product availability and trends, and more, experts say

Snacks & Candy

How Convenience Stores Can Improve Meat Snack, Jerky Sales

Innovation, creative retailers help spark growth in the snack segment

Technology/Services

C-Stores Headed in the Right Direction With Rewards Programs

Convenience operators are working to catch up to the success of loyalty programs in other industries

Trending

More from our partners