Technology/Services

NRF May Go to Court to Block Swipe Fee Lawsuit Deal

Group "categorically opposes the proposed settlement"

WASHINGTON -- The National Retail Federation (NRF) has announced that its board has authorized it to go to court to block the proposed $7.25 billion settlement of a federal antitrust lawsuit over skyrocketing Visa and MasterCard credit-card interchange or swipe fees that cost consumers hundreds of dollars a year.

"The National Retail Federation categorically opposes the proposed settlement," NRF president and CEO Matthew Shay said. "It does nothing to curb the anticompetitive behavior of Visa and MasterCard, and instead ensures that swipe fees paid by retailers and their customers will continue to rise while barring any future legal challenges. The proposal is a lose-lose-lose for merchants, consumers and competition. NRF will take any and all steps necessary to oppose the settlement as it is currently proposed and will work toward real reform of the swipe fee system."

A resolution authorizes NRF to take steps including "intervention in pending actions" in order to reach a solution "equitable to the broad merchant community."
NRF is exploring what form the legal action might take. The group is not a party to the lawsuit, and U.S. District Court Judge John Gleeson has not yet fully outlined how outside groups will be allowed to intervene, or if the case qualifies as a class action.

Shay announced the board's decision at the Annual Summit being held in Denver by NRF's Shop.org division. While swipe fees affect all merchants, online retailers are particularly impacted because most of their sales are paid for by plastic and the "card not present" rates Visa and MasterCard charge for online transactions can be a third higher than those paid by other merchants.

While other trade associations representing big-box retailers, convenience stores and grocers have spoken out against the settlement, NRF is the only trade association representing the full range of merchants who could be included in a class action.

"A key question for the judge is whether this settlement is fair to the nation's retailers," Shay said. "From what we have heard, it unequivocally is not. NRF's membership reflects the vast majority of retailers from Main Street small businesses to some of the nation's best-known brands. Short of a company-by-company poll, a vote by the NRF Board is the clearest test of what merchants think."

NRF is concerned by a number of provisions of the proposed settlement. The $7.25 billion amounts to pennies on the dollar. If the case went to trial, a verdict in favor of retailers could result in a judgment totaling hundreds of billions of dollars given the eight-year time period of the case and rules allowing for antitrust damages to be tripled.

Nothing is done to block future increases in swipe fees. Without competitive restrictions, the card industry would quickly recoup the cost of the settlement from the very retailers who have been harmed, and increases that have averaged 16% a year over the past decade could continue indefinitely.

Nothing is done to reform the anti-competitive, cartel-like system by which Visa and MasterCard each set fee schedules that all banks issuing their respective cards agree to follow. NRF has testified before Congress that the system is a violation of federal antitrust law.

Nothing is done to require the card industry to disclose the fees on the cards or otherwise create the transparency needed to bring about competition to lower fees.

A highly publicized provision allowing merchants to surcharge customers who pay by credit card is pointless because merchants are seeking to reduce prices for customers, not increase them. It also includes myriad restrictions that would make it difficult to surcharge even if someone wanted to.

Visa and MasterCard have promised to recognize merchant bargaining groups, but no requirement is made for the card companies to negotiate in good faith.

NRF is particularly concerned by a provision barring all merchants--including those that do not yet exist--from ever again suing Visa and MasterCard over swipe fees.

"We represent the nation's retailers and that means not just today's retailers but tomorrow's as well," Shay said. "It is our duty to foster an environment that is supportive of young, new entrepreneurs who will create the Walmarts and Amazons and Main Street shops of the future. We can't stand by and allow their rights to be stripped away before they've even had a chance to start their businesses."

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a CSP member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Foodservice

Opportunities Abound With Limited-Time Offers

For success, complement existing menu offerings, consider product availability and trends, and more, experts say

Snacks & Candy

How Convenience Stores Can Improve Meat Snack, Jerky Sales

Innovation, creative retailers help spark growth in the snack segment

Technology/Services

C-Stores Headed in the Right Direction With Rewards Programs

Convenience operators are working to catch up to the success of loyalty programs in other industries

Trending

More from our partners