WASHINGTON -- A group of senators pressed President Bush on Thursday to halt billions of dollars in sophisticated arms sales to Saudi Arabia and several other Gulf oil producers unless they agree to pump more petroleum, reflecting growing frustration in Congress over soaring energy costs, said the Associated Press.
The senators said if Saudi Arabia does not increase production, they would seek a resolution that would block the arms deals. But such a move would be difficult to achieve since it would require 60 votes to pass the Senate, must also pass the House and then would be subject [image-nocss] to an almost certain veto by the president.
In their letter to the president, the five senators—four Democrats and one of the chamber's two independents—said that Saudi Arabia has reduced oil production from about 9.5 million barrels a day in 2005 to 8.7 million barrels a day last year, well below its stated capacity of 11 million barrels a day.
"At a time when high energy prices are causing widespread anxiety among American households, we question the merit of rewarding members of OPEC with lucrative arms sales," they wrote.
"The Saudis have to understand that this is a two-way street," Senator Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) said at a news conference. "We provide them weapons...and then they rake us over the coals when it comes to oil."
Joining Schumer in the letter were Sens. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.), Mary Landrieu (D-La.), Bob Casey (D-Pa.) Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
At issue are administration plans to supply Saudi Arabia with $123 million worth of sophisticated precision-guided bomb technology as well as shipments of Patriot missile defense equipment worth $9.7 billion to the United Arab Emirates and a $1.7 billion deal with Kuwait to upgrade their missile systems. The arms sales are part of an effort by the administration to boost the defenses of friendly Arab nations in the oil-rich Gulf region.
Separately, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said the president should stop putting 70,000 barrels of oil a day into the government's Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPE), saying the oil would be better left in the market place to help lower prices. The U.S. Department of Energy recently announced it is extending oil shipments into the reserve, which holds 700 million barrels, through the end of the year.
Pelosi said the availability of an extra 70,000 barrels of oil now going into the reserve "could cut as much as 5 cents...to 24 cents off a gallon of gas" and send "a signal to oil markets to stop runaway speculation." She noted the Energy Department has estimated a change in cost of $2 a barrel for every 100,000 barrels of change in supply.
But administration officials in the past have maintained the amount of oil going into the reserve is so small it would have little if any effect on gasoline prices.
At a House hearing Thursday, Kevin Book, a senior energy analyst at FBR Capital Markets Corp., appeared to support that argument, saying that with global oil demand at 86 million barrels a day and other market factors "suspending the SPR fill might do very little" to reduce price volatility or speculation, said AP.
And Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada), said Thursday he had directed key committee chairmen to begin assembling a package of proposals aimed at addressing the growing impact that high gasoline and other energy prices are having on the economy. Reid declined to say what proposals were being considered. The plan is to bring a package to the Senate floor before Memorial Day.
Meanwhile, the New York Republican State Committee put out a statement saying that with the average price of gasoline in New York State approaching $4 per gallon heading into the busy summer driving season, families and businesses in New York and across America need relief right now.
Senator John McCain's gasoline tax relief plan, coupled with a similar proposal at the state level from Senator Andrew Lanza, would let the average New Yorker keep an extra five dollars every time they fill up at the gas station, said the statement. Businesses that use larger shipping vehicles to move their goods would save even more instead of being forced to pass along the added cost to consumers—costs which have been contributing to the inflated costs of food and other necessities.
"These sensible Republican plans will provide immediate relief for the problems people are facing every day, while longer-term solutions are proposed, researched and enacted," the statement added. "Unfortunately, Senator Obama has flatly opposed the plan as a bad idea, even though he supported suspending a gas tax as a State Senator in Illinois. Senator Clinton, knowing the pain New Yorkers are feeling, has still refused to support it."
It concluded, "This issue once again underscores that the Democrats are out of touch with the everyday problems that New Yorkers and Americans face. The problem is painfully clear; it's time for action."
Click hereto read recent CSP Daily News coverage of additional Democratic and Republican sparring over high gasoline prices.
Members help make our journalism possible. Become a CSP member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.