Tobacco

Supreme Court Accepts PM Case

Agrees to hear fed vs. state tobacco regulation case

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Friday to consider whether tobacco companies can be protected from state court judgments since cigarettes are regulated by the federal government, said the Associated Press.

In one of four appeals accepted Friday, justices had been asked to decide whether lawsuits that accuse cigarette makers of wrongdoing can be shifted out of state court and into federal court, under a special provision.

That's what happened in Arkansas, where Philip Morris was sued in a class-action case claiming [image-nocss] that the company violated state law in marketing its "light" cigarettes. The suit claimed the cigarettes were more dangerous than the company advertised. Tobacco companies have faced similar suits around the country. The suit covered people who used Marlboro Lights and Cambridge Lights.

The tobacco company sought to have the case moved into federal court under a "federal officer" provision that allows suits against federal officials to be kept out of state courts.

Federal courts are more desirable to corporations facing lawsuits, in part because state juries in some parts of the country are considered more likely to return large damage awards.

The company contends that its marketing of cigarettes under the regulation of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) made it a "person acting under" a federal officer. Philip Morris lawyers said the FTC "exercised unprecedented detailed and direct control" over things like cigarette advertising.

David Frederick, the Washington attorney representing those who sued, said the decision would hurt state authority to ensure its citizens are protected under its own laws. "FTC regulation of light cigarettes is anything but extraordinary," Frederick wrote.

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the FTC has exercised comprehensive control over Philip Morris's advertising, a conclusion that the Bush administration called "incorrect." Yet the administration said the case does not merit Supreme Court review, that the decision's impact is "entirely unclear" and that the more appropriate course would be to allow the issue to play out in the lower courts.

Philip Morris USA Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Altria Group Inc. Altria Group's former name was Philip Morris Cos. Inc.

The case is Watson v. Philip Morris Cos. Inc, 05-1284.

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a CSP member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Technology/Services

How to Make the C-Store the Hero for Retail Media Success

Here’s what motivates consumers when it comes to in-store and digital advertising

Mergers & Acquisitions

Soft Landing Now, But If Anyone Is Happy, Please Stand Up to Be Seen

Addressing the economic elephants in the room and their impact on M&A

Foodservice

Opportunities Abound With Limited-Time Offers

For success, complement existing menu offerings, consider product availability and trends, and more, experts say

Trending

More from our partners