Beverages

Hansen Asks Court to Vacate Decision

Deal already existed between Monster, Freek

CORONA, Calif. -- Hansen Natural Corp. earlier this week asked the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to vacate its decision relating to a preliminary injunction issued in the lawsuit between Hansen and National Beverage Co. In that suit, Hansen accused National Beverage of unlawfully infringing Hansen's Monster trademarks and trade dress rights with National's Freek energy drinks.

Hansen said that prior to the Ninth Circuit's decision, it and National Beverage had entered into a binding settlement agreement that Hansen believes renders the court's decision [image-nocss] moot.

Hansen said that the Ninth Circuit's decision removed a preliminary injunction on an old design for the Freek cans that National Beverage formally abandoned more than six months ago. National subsequently redesigned its Freek cans, which it has sold for several months, and which remained the subject of the parties' litigation. The Ninth Circuit's ruling did not relate to the redesigned cans, on which an infringement trial had been set for August 2007, but which was subsequently taken off calendar in light of the settlement agreement concluded between Hansen and National Beverage.

In addition, because the Ninth Circuit was reviewing a preliminary injunction entered just a few weeks after Hansen filed the lawsuit, it could not consider all of Hansen's subsequent evidence that National Beverage infringed Hansen's rights, including surveys showing that 25-30% of consumers were confused by the Freek cans. Hansen remains confident that the overwhelming evidence of National Beverage's infringement would have ultimately convinced a jury that both the old and new versions of the Freek cans were conceived and designed to unfairly capitalize on the Monster brand.

Although the terms of the settlement agreement are confidential, Hansen expects National to live up to its obligations under the agreement. Hansen will enforce its rights under that agreement in court, if necessary, said Hansen CEO Rodney Sacks, who added that Hansen believes that the settlement is binding.

Sacks also said, Hansen welcomes competition and has no dispute with hundreds of companies that market and sell energy drinks; however, Hansen cannot accept and will never tolerate attempts by any company to free ride on Monster's brand equity and quality by confusing the public with copycat products designed to unfairly capitalize on the famous Monster brand trade dress and trademarks.

Based in Corona, Calif., Hansen markets and distributes Hansen's Natural Sodas, Signature Sodas, fruit juice Smoothies, Energy drinks, Energade energy sports drinks, E20 Energy Water, multi-vitamin juice drinks in aseptic packaging, Junior Juice juice, iced teas, lemonades and juice cocktails, apple juice and juice blends, Blue Sky brand beverages, Monster Energy brand energy drinks, Java Monster brand coffee energy drinks, Lost Energy brand energy drinks, Joker Mad Energy, Unbound Energy and Ace Energy brand energy drinks, Rumba brand energy juice and Fizzit brand powdered drink mixes.

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a CSP member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Foodservice

Opportunities Abound With Limited-Time Offers

For success, complement existing menu offerings, consider product availability and trends, and more, experts say

Snacks & Candy

How Convenience Stores Can Improve Meat Snack, Jerky Sales

Innovation, creative retailers help spark growth in the snack segment

Technology/Services

C-Stores Headed in the Right Direction With Rewards Programs

Convenience operators are working to catch up to the success of loyalty programs in other industries

Trending

More from our partners