Fuels

Shell to Pay

Oil company agrees to $10.75 million settlement for station violations

SAN DIEGO -- San Diego County and city officials announced Wednesday they had reached a $10.75 million settlement with Shell Oil Co. over environmental-health violations at its local gas stations dating back to 1999, reported the San Diego Union Tribune.

"Today the environment in San Diego just got safer," District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis said at a news conference downtown that also included City Attorney Michael Aguirre, the head of the county's Environmental Health Department and other county and city lawyers.

It is the largest [image-nocss] settlement ever in an environmental protection case in San Diego County, the report said.

The enforcement action came after more than 2,200 violations were found during routine county inspections at Shell and former Texaco stations in the county, said the report, citing officials. The problems included leak-detection sensors that were tampered with, record-keeping problems and improper disposal of waste at some stations, officials said.

"Fortunately the violations didn't include gas leaking into the underground water," Dumanis said.

Shell has agreed to install new tamper-resistant underground sensors at its 62 Shell stations in the county, increase maintenance and improve employee training and create management systems to prevent future problems, according to the newspaper, citing the settlement. The company also agreed to install new sensors at 40 other stations in the state, it added.

The company also will pay $4.75 million in costs, attorney's fees and civil penalties, which will be divided among the District Attorney's Office, County Counsel's Office, county Department of Environmental Health and City Attorney's Office, the report said.

The agreement is with Equilon Enterprises. It was reached less than a week after the city and county filed a lawsuit against the company. The judgment was signed Wednesday by Superior Court Judge Richard E. L. Strauss.

In announcing the settlement, Dumanis warned that similar action against other stations in the region was possible. You cannot continue violating the environmental laws and endangering the health of people in San Diego without consequences," Dumanis said. "We are going to hold those accountable who would wish to pollute our environment and we are going to hit them where it hurts the mostin the pocket."

Aguirre said the case centered on leak-detection systems at stations that were supposed to ensure the integrity of underground storage tanks and make sure hazardous materials didn't leach into the ground. "It is a real clear danger to the groundwater supply here in San Diego," Aguirre said.

Senior Deputy County Counsel Rodney Lorang told the Union Tribune that station owners and managers moved or tampered with sensors that were supposed to detect if water flowed underneath gas pumps or leaked into the secondary containment systems around USTs. Lorang said new sensors will be installed that will automatically shut a station down if they are moved. "No gas will flow. That will force the operators to be more honest, that will force the owners to provide better systems," he said.

Violations were found at stations that were owned and operated by Shell as well as independently owned franchisees. Shell was held responsible because it owns the tanks, Lorang added.

Gary Erbeck, director of the county's Department of Environmental Health, said the company was "pretty nonresponsive" to the violations found at its stations over the past six years. "It took us a number of years to get their attention," he told the paper.

This is the second major enforcement county and city agencies have taken against a gasoline company in recent years, the report said. BP West Coast Products, which owns or franchises 83 ARCO stations in the county, agreed in September 2003 to a $4 million settlement that arose from an environmental protection case filed jointly by the county and city. As part of that settlement, the company agreed it would install sensors in all of its USTs by January 2004. But in March 2005, it was ordered to pay $1.3 million because it had failed to update sensors on 21 of its tanks.

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a CSP member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Foodservice

Opportunities Abound With Limited-Time Offers

For success, complement existing menu offerings, consider product availability and trends, and more, experts say

Snacks & Candy

How Convenience Stores Can Improve Meat Snack, Jerky Sales

Innovation, creative retailers help spark growth in the snack segment

Technology/Services

C-Stores Headed in the Right Direction With Rewards Programs

Convenience operators are working to catch up to the success of loyalty programs in other industries

Trending

More from our partners