Company News

Suits Surface Over BP Fuel Flap

Ill., Ind. residents file federal lawsuits seeking class-action status

CHICAGO -- At least four federal lawsuits have been filed against BP stemming from the company's recent fuel quality issue that caused car problems for some Midwestern motorists, reported Legal Newsline.

Filed late last week in federal courts in Illinois and Indiana, plaintiffs in all four suits seek class-action status and recovery for the damage they claim was caused by tainted BP gasoline they purchased earlier this month, said the report.

BP on August 20 announced that "approximately 200 retail outlets in Northwest Indiana and the Chicagoland area were supplied with off-specification regular-grade gasoline over the last seven days, along with 20 additional retail sites in the Milwaukee area that received off-specification premium gasoline."

See Related Content below for previous CSP Daily Newscoverage.

The company said it traced the problem to BP's Whiting, Ind., refinery and made changes to the plant's operations in order to bring the fuel produced there back within normal specifications. The problem, it said, was created by a batch of fuel shipped from the Indiana fuel storage terminal that contained a higher than normal level of polymeric residue, which can cause hard starting and other drivability issues.

The first of the four suits was filed that same day in federal court in Chicago, the report said. That suit, brought by Chicago resident Samantha Price, contends the cost to repair what it estimates to be "thousands" of affected vehicles exceeds $75,000.

The other three suits, one in Chicago and two in the federal court in Hammond, Ind., were filed on Friday. These three suits claim the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million, noting that thousands of vehicles were affected and individual repair costs range from $300 to $1,200.

BP spokesperson Scott Dean told his company does not comment on the specifics of pending litigation.

Price contends in her lawsuit that she purchased fuel at a BP outlet in Hammond on August 16. She paid cash and did not get a receipt. The next morning, Price claims her Volkswagen Jetta would not start. She got a jump from a mechanic to bring her vehicle to the dealership, which the suits states provided some repair after running a computer diagnostic and download, as well as a 20,000 mile inspection. Price asserts that her car again didn't start on August 18. She had it towed to her dealership and tested for "bad fuel" because by that time, her lawsuit claims news of the BP fuel problem was "widely known." After it discovered the fuel in Price's vehicle was contaminated, the dealership removed the fuel, put in new fuel and replaced a filter, the suit states, adding that Price's damages were $344 not including towing costs.

Price contends she called BP about the issue and was put on hold for more than one hour to provide her name and number. At the time she filed her suit on August 23, Price claims she had not yet heard back from BP.

Her suit includes counts against BP for breach of implied warranty of merchantability, strict product liability, negligence, punitive damages and claims under the consumer fraud laws of Indiana, where she purchased the BP fuel at the crux of her complaint.

In her suit, Price defines the proposed class as "all consumers of BP Premium, Mid and Low Grade gasoline from the Whiting, Ind., refinery from approximately August 13 to August 20, 2012, purchased in Michigan, Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin."

She asserts that her suit meets the requirements for class certification and asked that she be named class representative.

The other three suits filed against BP make similar factual allegations and requests regarding class certification, although some of them call for a class definition that includes motorists who purchased gasoline during longer time frames than the one proposed in Price's suit.

The suit brought by Illinois resident Natalie Fisher claims she traded her vehicle in after thinking it was failing only to later learn her car problems were caused by tainted BP fuel.

The two other suits against BP were brought by Indiana residents Natalie Custy and Mark Gonzales.

Members help make our journalism possible. Become a CSP member today and unlock exclusive benefits, including unlimited access to all of our content. Sign up here.

Multimedia

Exclusive Content

Foodservice

Opportunities Abound With Limited-Time Offers

For success, complement existing menu offerings, consider product availability and trends, and more, experts say

Snacks & Candy

How Convenience Stores Can Improve Meat Snack, Jerky Sales

Innovation, creative retailers help spark growth in the snack segment

Technology/Services

C-Stores Headed in the Right Direction With Rewards Programs

Convenience operators are working to catch up to the success of loyalty programs in other industries

Trending

More from our partners